'12 Years A Slave' (2013) Review
Steve McQueen (‘Hunger’, ‘Shame’) directed, whilst John
Ridley wrote the screenplay. Chiwetel Ejiofor leads the cast as Solomon
Northup, with Lupita Nyong’o, Michael Fassbender, Benedict Cumberbatch and Brad
Pitt supporting in various roles.
Adapted from the best-selling 19th-century memoir written by
Solomon Northup, a free black man from upstate New York who suddenly had his
liberty taken away after being kidnapped and sold for slave labour in
Louisiana, ’12 Years A Slave’ (12YAS) tackles the issue of slavery with
commendable realism and a level of unrelenting brutality not before seen in
other films confronting the same subject.
Unlike the more recent slavery-based pieces, such as Quentin
Tarentino’s ‘Django: Unchained’ (2012) and Lee Daniels’ ‘The Butler’ (2013),
12YAS is revised from a first-hand account, giving a more personal, hard-hitting
and raw experience for the audience. At times, the piece is hard to watch, from
the sequence where Northup is strung up at a tree and the shot lingers on for
what feels like an age whilst people around him continue on with their work, to
the flat-out savage scene in which Patsy (Nyong’o) is tied to a pole and
whipped by Northup and Epp’s (Fassbender). The film does not hold back, and nor
should it. It was made to make the audience feel uncomfortable, as the topic of
slavery in general in the West today does; many would like to forget that this
kind of behaviour ever happened, but it can’t be and shouldn’t be. The piece
should be commended for its portrayal of slavery as it may be the first to
truly do it justice. Audiences need to be shocked by this, because it is true.
The acting talent is stellar, with Fassbender and Nyong’o particularly
impressive as the crazed, obsessive slave owner and the emotionally crippled
aim of the former’s affections, respectively. Ejiofor does a notable job in the
lead, showing the progress of Northup’s changing attitude over time. From the
initial defiance to when he embraces with the other slaves when singing “Roll
Jordan Roll”, as well as the very touching final scene when he is reunited with
his family. However, looking at it from a cinematic angle, not just an historic
angle, the character is not fully explored or developed. Audiences will side with him, as they should,
but that may just be the problem, he is looked at as an idol, not necessarily a
real person. This isn’t Ejiofor’s
fault, leading on to a larger problem with the film.
As a piece of cinema 12YAS lacks something. The story is
without doubt powerful and engaging with some very moving scenes, yet it does
not go beyond the historical documentation of which is comes from. There are
traces of McQueen’s talent and vision, but it is not developed consistently. It
almost feels as if the piece has been made for the commercial and mainstream
audiences, as it is rather simplistic in its approach, and it also leaves out
some parts of Northup’s original account, whilst adding some fictitious events.
Conversely, it can be argued that this was McQueen’s intention, to show the
rawness of Northup’s life and elicit a response, which it does. The script isn’t
necessarily anything truly remarkable, but again, this way, it meant there were
no deviations from the source. Also, the inclusion of Brad Pitt in the role of
Samuel Bass, a progressive Canadian, seemed forced and actually detracted from
the film towards the end. I can’t help but feel that if an actor not so well
known played the role, I would have connected more with the character.
No comments:
Post a Comment